Sentimentality vs Practicality - Examining Ranieri's Sacking
It's tough to know where to even start with this discussion. The sacking of Claudio Ranieri is one of the most cutthroat, ruthless, emotionless acts in football for as long as I can remember. For many people it was the symbol of everything that is wrong in the game, a sign that all owners care about is making money, and that the current footballing climate is toxic and doesn't give managers the time that they deserve.
The backlash to Ranieri's sacking was instinctive and shot throughout the footballing world. However, there has of course, been a backlash to that backlash. The rhetoric of those in defence of Ranieri's sacking has been that it was a footballing and business decision, and that sentimentality cannot come into it. Whether or not Ranieri deserves to stay as Leicester boss is irrelevant, what's important is keeping the club in the Premier League, and the intelligent, practical decision was to sack him.
First of all, I think that this does highlight an increasing problem in football, which has only been exacerbated by the sheer financial reward of staying in the Premier League. No longer can teams down the bottom afford to give managers time that they require to improve their squads, before they have to press the panic button. And the same is true at the top of the table, as Brendan Rodgers and Jose Mourinho were unfairly yanked from their positions based off one poor season. Recent examples down the bottom include Francesco Guidolin, Tim Sherwood, Nigel Adkins, Quique Sanchez Flores, and frankly anyone who has managed at Sunderland not called Sam Allardyce (pray for Moyes).
Secondly, I think Ranieri's sacking is absolutely, unequivocally a disgrace. To treat the man who brought Leicester the biggest honour in its history in this manner is absolutely disgusting. This isn't just Leicester's first league win in modern football, it's their first ever top flight win. It's impossible to understate how big an achievement Ranieri has made with these players, and for the players and board to stab him in the back this way is an aberration.
I don't want to focus on the sentimental side, as that has been put far more eloquently by people closer to the club than I. And whilst it's currently uncertain whether or not four Leicester players (Schmeichel, Morgan, Vardy and Albrighton) went behind their manager's back to complain to the board, what is clear is that the players have a lot to answer for. If four players at my club did that then I would want their contract's terminated. If they didn't, then they still share a lot of responsibility for his sacking.
You can talk about tactical errors that Ranieri has made this season, but frankly too many players seem to not care about the club. You can accuse Ranieri of many errors this season, but at no point did he ever stop caring about Leicester Football Club, and his heart-breaking words upon his dismissal just underline how little Vardy and co in comparison do care. The level of effort, fight, stomach and integrity that Leicester players have shown on the pitch is truly despicable and many of them need to have a good long look on the mirror.
Before I attempt to undermine the practical argument for Ranieri's sacking, I want to discuss whether or not the practical argument works to undermine the sentimentality argument. Assuming that Ranieri being sacked was the right decision for the club, does that mean that they should have sacked him? I'm inclined to think no. Weighing up the sentimentality vs the practical arguments, even before I undermine the latter, I think the simple truth is that if you'd offered Leicester fans a league title and then relegation two years ago, every single one of them would have taken that deal. In a world where football is becoming increasingly cutthroat, a man as good as Claudio Ranieri, at a club like Leicester, surely deserves the benefit of the doubt, less than twelve months after pulling off the greatest achievement in sporting history.
So the practical argument, the crux of the defence for this action. Ranieri was sacked with his side having been knocked out of the FA Cup, just beaten 2-1 by Sevilla in Seville and one point outside the relegation zone in the Premier League. So to begin with, the focus has to be the Premier League. Losing in the FA Cup is frankly irrelevant at this stage, although it didn't help that it added to Leicester's dreadful run of form, and given that even reaching the Champions League Last 16 was an achievement, let alone only losing 2-1 to a vastly superior Sevilla side, and grabbing an away goal.
So what makes the sacking odd is the timing. A 2-1 defeat in Seville is not a bad result for Leicester by any stretch. What I suspect may have been important for the owners is that the performance was poor. Leicester's players couldn't seem to get themselves up for one of the biggest games in their history, and they took that as irrevocable proof that Ranieri had lost the dressing room.
Now this is an interesting point and one that I want to focus on. The idea of a manager losing the dressing room is one that irritates me. Yes, man management is a crucial part of management, which is part of why I've argued that Jose Mourinho cannot be the greatest manager of all time as he often struggles with that side of the game. But nevertheless, it speaks volumes about the characters of the players. The same players who turned down big money moves to stay at Leicester are barely bothering this season, with the attitude seemingly being: if we go down, I'll move to a better club. And this is part of the problem: it can be quite hard to motivate players who simply don't care.
One key point that has come out of this discussion is: you can't sack a whole squad. And that at least is a valid point. And Ranieri should certainly have done more with say dropping the likes of Morgan and Vardy, who have been genuinely awful this season. But given that Leicester have been unable to replace N'golo Kante, they can't afford to also replace title-winning performances from Vardy, Mahrez, Huth and Morgan. Even left back Christian Fuchs looks a shadow of his former self.
Nevertheless, does sacking Ranieri increase Leicester's chances of staying up this season? That, I think is the core question. Leicester's owners stuck by Nigel Pearson in 2015 and were rewarded by Premier League survival, so why hasn't Ranieri earned at least as much faith as Pearson? Leicester were not in the drop zone when he was sacked, and whilst they have been awful in recent weeks, there are plenty of very bad teams still in the relegation battle.
The other point that I don't understand is that when the owners appointed Ranieri in the first place, Leicester were thoroughly expected to be in a relegation battle. Now they are: they've returned painfully to the mean, but rather than doubling down on faith in their manager, they have decided to push the panic button.
Leicester's players need to take the bulk of the flak for this season, and if Leicester do go down, as in my opinion looks likely at the current stage, then they should keep hold of all of their key players, and make them earn their way back into the Premier League. Either way, what does Craig Shakespeare bring to the table? Either he stood back and watched Ranieri lose the dressing room and did nothing to stop it, or alternatively. he did everything he could to get the players to perform and failed miserably. So either he's going to improve the players, which frankly would raise questions about his character, or, just as likely, Leicester are doomed.
The Hard and Fast Section
- England saw off tricky Italian tactics to win 36-15.
- Wins also for Ireland and Scotland. Wales in disarray.
- Man United picked up the EFL Cup in controversial circumstances.
- Spurs destroyed Stoke. Chelsea beat Swansea. Business as usual.














